England’s long history has been plagued by many
tragedies. From the Black Death to the Great Fire of London, for over two
thousand years misery and bloodshed have left a palpable presence on the
English landscape. From north to south, east to west, within its fine castles,
abbeys, cathedrals, churches, stately homes and historic coaching inns, their ancient
walls and ornate furnishings pay testament to legendary and long forgotten stories of ambition,
greed, love and betrayal.
No story is more famous in England’s past
than that of the sons of Edward IV, more famously remembered as the Princes in
the Tower. Everyone knows the story. According to the most popular version of
the tale, the boys’ legitimate succession to the throne of England and the
Dukedom of York as the heirs to the late King Edward IV – victor at Tewkesbury,
first upholder of the House of York and King of England since 1461 – came to a
silent and sinister conclusion at the hands of their bloodthirsty uncle,
history’s favourite villain, Shakespeare’s hunchback. King Richard III.
But despite their deaths over four hundred
years ago, the question of when and how they met their end has never been
agreed upon. Tainted by centuries of imperfect knowledge and misconception and
heaped in the immortality of England’s dark history, the true story of what
became of the Princes in the Tower still remains something of an enigma.
Following the death of their father, it was the right of his eldest son and
heir to succeed him as king. The eldest of the boys was Edward, aged 12, who
was proclaimed Edward V merely two days after his father’s death. Over the
coming weeks, the boy was recorded as having come to London at which point he
came under the protection of his uncle, a hero of the recent wars, the late king’s
brother and loyal ally, known at the time as Richard, Duke of Gloucester. In
time, the king in waiting was joined by his young brother, Richard, Duke of
York, and together they took up residence in England’s great fortress, the
Tower of London. As the days passed, plans for Edward’s coronation continued
until, one day, without warning, Richard had the princes declared illegitimate
and banned from succeeding to the throne.
The story of the two boys from this moment
onwards is fraught with controversy. In the early days, the princes were often
seen playing and shooting on the battlements or in the Tower garden. But, as
the weeks passed, they were seen less and less. A dark shadow had emerged over
the Tower. The people of London were said to have been overcome with grief as
rumour began to spread of evil actions or intent; citizens were said to weep
freely and suddenly, even to the point that people refused to talk of them.
The chroniclers of the time were not slow
to point their fingers, and not only in England. Rumour abounded that the boys
had been murdered, be it by the sword, the stone or even drowned in a barrel of
Malmsey Wine, a tactic already used on their other uncle, George, the Duke of
Clarence. Despite the persistent rumours, it was not until many years later that
the story finally acquired a degree of clarity. In the early years of Henry
VIII’s eventful reign, a most compelling version was written by the chancellor
of England at the time, the great Sir Thomas More, later saint. However, due to
the circumstances that led to his untimely death, More’s tale remained incomplete,
and, for many years, unpublished.
Of all the chronicles, it is More’s that provides
us with the greatest detail. According to More, the Princes’ end came on the
orders of Richard III and his closest schemers. Their bodies were smothered in
their beds and buried at the foot of the Tower stair where, in the reign of Charles
II, two skeletons were found. Their ages were estimated to be 12 and 9 and
later identified as those of the Princes. They were buried in a room off the
great Lady Chapel in Westminster Abbey. An elegant urn stands close to the tomb
of Elizabeth and Mary, its words written in Latin, its creation the work of Sir
Christopher Wren.
While the story recounted by More is
striking, original in narrative and precise in detail, the mystery of the Princes
in the Tower remains to this day ‘unsolved’. Perhaps this can be explained away
by the time delay between the writing of More’s chronicle and its publication. Alternatively,
the gap of nearly 200 years between disappearance and discovery of the bodies at
the foot of the Tower stair, i.e. the absence of hard proof, was equally so strong
a cause.
Yet, maybe, there is another even easier
explanation. Perhaps More was simply incorrect. Perhaps the Princes were never
murdered at all.
Of all the theories that have been put
forward over the years, the most compelling and elaborate is surely that of Holbein,
originally credited to a retired English jeweler, Jack Leslau. Should the
theory be correct, the fate of the princes belongs not to any urn or
sarcophagus in Westminster Abbey, but the legacies of two other prominent
historical gentlemen from Tudor London.
According to Leslau, instead of being
smothered in their beds or by any other means as the chroniclers suggested, the
Princes were moved out of the Tower and placed in the protection of their loved
ones: either an agreement between the boys’ mother, Elizabeth Woodville, and
Richard III, or, alternatively, an agreement between the family and Richard’s
successor, Henry Tudor. Supporters of the former claim that Richard had the
blessing of the family, whereas, according to others, Henry reigned with a guarantee
the princes no longer desired the throne. Should Leslau be correct, the former king
returned to civilization, not as a prince or lord, but as an apparent son of a
man once Comptroller of the Royal Household. Walking in the same circle, his
brother had arguably an even finer pedigree: returning to the limelight as President
of the Royal College of Physicians and husband of Thomas More’s own foster
daughter.
Such tales, be they wild or based merely on
rumour, are easily dismissed without full understanding of the facts. But what
of the evidence? Can proof of the pudding be found simply in testing the
relevant bodies for DNA? In 1995 Leslau made what seemed life-changing
progress. The graves of both men were to be excavated, their bodies subjected
to academic scrutiny. Yet, up until now, the tests remain undone.
But an even more incredible piece of
evidence might possibly be found within the brushwork of a late 16th
century copy of an early 16th century masterpiece. In the 1520s, the
great artist Hans Holbein the Younger was staying in England; among his patrons
was Sir Thomas More. Holbein completed at least two works in around 1527, sadly
later lost in a great fire. Fortunately the originals were seen by the English
artist, Rowland Lockey, who made copies of them. The copies are now hanging in
both the National Portrait Gallery and a large estate in Yorkshire named
Nostell Priory.
Though the quality of the Lockey copies may
rival the works of the great artists of the time, the subject matter, when
viewed in the modern day, is certainly intriguing, but also, perhaps, largely
forgettable, so similar is the scene to many others that hang on the walls of
England’s galleries. In the portrait we see 12 members of the More family, the
most famous being Thomas More himself. Most members have Latin writing above or
below, confirming their identities. Two, however, are less easy to explain. The
first is the figure of a teenage boy, seen reading in the top right corner, for
whom there is no writing at all. Of more interest still is the young man
standing at the far right. According to the Latin, his name is John, his title,
The Rightful Heir. John is standing beneath a fleur-de-lis – one of several. Equally
intriguing, he is standing at the highest point of the painting, a station commonly
used to symbolize positions of importance.
Look at the painting, particularly the men
in question. Then compare it to the sketch to the right, Holbein's original prototype. Notice the
differences. Who is this John?
What is the artist trying to tell us? What
secrets are hidden within this great scene?
The Holbein connection is a central feature of The Plantagenet Vendetta, the latest bestselling thriller by John Paul Davis, currently available on Amazon in both the UK and US.
Jackpot City Casino Site - Choegocasino.com
ReplyDeleteThe casino 바카라사이트 site features more than 1,200 slot machines, 메리트 카지노 주소 100+ table games choegocasino including blackjack, roulette, craps, keno and roulette, plus a variety